Table
| P | Pts | GF | GA | GD | w | d | l | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Kirchheim | 2 | 6 | 191 | 133 | 58 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2. | Koblenz | 2 | 6 | 201 | 170 | 31 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 3. | Crailsheim | 2 | 6 | 168 | 140 | 28 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 4. | Giessen | 2 | 6 | 185 | 165 | 20 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 5. | Heidelberg | 2 | 3 | 192 | 159 | 33 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 6. | Tübingen | 2 | 3 | 161 | 144 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 7. | Wolmirstedt | 1 | 3 | 73 | 61 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 8. | Paderborn | 3 | 3 | 253 | 242 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| 9. | Quakenbrück | 2 | 3 | 167 | 161 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 10. | Bremerhaven | 2 | 3 | 176 | 174 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 11. | Bochum | 2 | 3 | 166 | 170 | -4 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 12. | Essen | 3 | 3 | 247 | 258 | -11 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| 13. | Nürnberg | 2 | 3 | 150 | 167 | -17 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 14. | Köln | 1 | 0 | 83 | 85 | -2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 15. | Bayreuth | 1 | 0 | 79 | 89 | -10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 16. | Ulm | 2 | 0 | 153 | 178 | -25 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 17. | Göttingen | 2 | 0 | 142 | 172 | -30 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 18. | Karlsruhe | 2 | 0 | 126 | 174 | -48 | 0 | 0 | 2 |