Table
| P | Pts | GF | GA | GD | w | d | l | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Crailsheim | 2 | 6 | 172 | 114 | 58 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2. | Kirchheim | 2 | 6 | 186 | 150 | 36 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 3. | Heidelberg | 2 | 6 | 167 | 143 | 24 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 4. | Wolmirstedt | 3 | 6 | 232 | 223 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 5. | Köln | 3 | 6 | 247 | 255 | -8 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 6. | Karlsruhe | 2 | 3 | 175 | 174 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 7. | Ulm | 1 | 3 | 93 | 92 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 8. | Bremerhaven | 2 | 3 | 155 | 156 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 9. | Göttingen | 2 | 3 | 169 | 174 | -5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 10. | Koblenz | 2 | 3 | 163 | 171 | -8 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 11. | Bochum | 2 | 3 | 159 | 171 | -12 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 12. | Tübingen | 2 | 3 | 156 | 171 | -15 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 13. | Nürnberg | 2 | 3 | 144 | 165 | -21 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 14. | Paderborn | 1 | 0 | 81 | 84 | -3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 15. | Quakenbrück | 2 | 0 | 167 | 183 | -16 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 16. | Giessen | 2 | 0 | 137 | 156 | -19 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 17. | Essen | 1 | 0 | 74 | 118 | -44 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 18. | Bayreuth | 2 | 0 | 165 | 213 | -48 | 0 | 0 | 2 |